Issue Overview
Research by the Smith River Project has uncovered widespread contamination
of domestic wells by the agricultural chemical 1,2-Dichloropropane
(1,2-D), a cancer-causing agent, in the small town of Smith River.
Most shocking about the finding is that the state and local governments
conducted water testing during the 1980s, found tragically high
levels of the carcinogen in wells, then, citing "budget cuts,"
abandoned the area with minimal community outreach and no cleanup
efforts.
See Estuary Enhancement Program for
background, or our Testing Program or
groundwater contamination alert pages
for complete details. We have also developed a complete list of
chemicals found in the Smith River estuary.
TAKE ACTION
TO SAVE THE SMITH
Check out our Action Alert
to find out how you can participate in protecting the Smith
River and its residents from toxics.
|
DONATE NOW to support water testing
efforts.
The recent round of water testing, including advertising and chemical
analysis, cost the Smith River Project more than $10,000. A donation
of $50, $100 or more will go a long way toward easing this financial
burden.
Slideshow
Check out our slideshow of photos from our water testing
events.
Join our email ActionList
and we will let you know new slideshows are available!
|
Free Water Testing Day Results
Many local residents took advantage of the June 15 Free Water Testing
event and were grateful for the opportunity to test their water.
In his June 13th editorial, Fred Obee, editor of the Del Norte County
Daily Triplicate, wrote, "When it comes to drinking water,
the case is clear: it should be free from toxic contaminants. Residents
of the area should take advantage of the free tests. Everyone should
know whether the water they are drinking is safe." (full
editorial) This sentiment was echoed by dozens of local families
during the weekend of the Free Water Testing Day.
For the Free Water Testing Day the Smith River Project contracted
with the state-accredited lab Analytical Sciences, Inc. to test
17 wells in the Smith River area. Of the four wells recently found
tainted, one registered 5.6 ppb of 1,2-D, another was 5 ppb and
a third came in at 4.5 ppb. The fourth well tested at 1 ppb. Perhaps
most surprising about the contamination was that these were all
deep wells (between 110 and 120 feet each), three of which had never
been tested by the state.
The RWQCB agreed to conduct further testing to verify these findings,
and discovered six additional wells contaminated with 1,2-D and
significant levels of nitrates "in just about all of them,"
according to RWQCB official Tuck Vath.
Contamination by "Historic Chemical Use" Points to Current
Pesticide Problems
In August 2001, the California North Coast Regional Water Quality
control Board (RWQCB) responded to pressure by the Smith River Project
and re-opened an old case of 1,2-D contamination in the small town
of Smith River, just upstream of the Smith River Estuary. During
the 1980s the RWQCB discovered some of the highest levels of 1,2-D
contamination found anywhere in the U.S. Out of 46 wells tested,
37 were tainted with 1,2-D at levels that reached 32 times higher
than the federal government's current "maximum contaminant
level" of 5 parts per billion (ppb). Inexplicably, neither
the state nor the county took meaningful measures to protect local
residents from 1,2-D poisoning, which resulted from pesticide use
on lily farms in the area. By 1991 the RWQCB, citing "budget
cuts," virtually abandoned the Smith River area despite 1,2-D
levels remaining quite high. The RWQCB's 2001 testing was only the
second time in 10 years that the state had revisited Smith River's
contaminated wells. (The state tested one well in 1996 at the request
of a Smith River resident; that well turned up positive for 1,2-D.)
Of the three wells tested by the state last year, one was contaminated
with1,2-D.
The Smith River Project followed the state's results by testing
three more wells in December 2001, finding that all three contained
1,2-D above the government's "public health goal" of 0.5
ppb. The Smith River Project then asked RWQCB to conduct more comprehensive
well tests in Smith River; citing a lack of funds, the state refused.
The next logical step was for the Smith River Project to conduct
it's own comprehensive testing. Placing two full-page ads in the
local daily newspaper, the Project announced a "Free Water
Testing Day" to occur June 15, with a mobile water testing
lab to be parked at the public boat launch in Smith River to offer
residents quick results.You can view a copy
of the ad in acrobat/pdf format (1.4 MB) (RequiresAdobe
Acrobat Reader) or see the issue overview
for links to more detailed information.
Lily Growers Rally the Troops
Smith River lily farmers (who grow nearly 90 percent of all U.S.
lily bulbs) rallied 100 Del Norte County residents to oppose the
Smith River Project's Free Water Testing Day. Speakers included
members of gun clubs and property-rights groups, several of whom
accused the Smith River Project of acting as a "front"
for U.S. corporations and the United Nations in an effort to forcefully
relocate rural residents to urban areas and take over their land
for parks to be used by "the elite." One speaker claimed
that the Free Water Testing program was akin to the September 11
attack on the World Trade Center. Nonetheless, many local residents
in the politically cloistered county found the growers' rally to
be overreacting and transparent.
"The farmers and their supporters went ballistic protesting
the well testing," said a Crescent City letter writer to the
Del Norte County Triplicate. "Such behavior is characteristic
of a cover-up. What do they know or suspect that they don't want
the rest of us to know?"
What they know, and what many local residents acknowledge, is that
lily farmers on the Smith River Plain, which surrounds the biologically
vital Smith River Estuary, annually distribute hundreds of thousand
of pounds of more than 40 toxic pesticides on land surrounding California's
healthiest fish-bearing river. What lily farmers also know is that
the Smith River Project sees historic contamination as a "canary,"
possibly alerting local residents to dangers posed by current use
of agricultural chemicals. Soon the Smith River Project will test
surface waters, soil, air quality, estuary muds, fish and plants
in and around the Smith River Estuary, and conduct a human health
assessment to determine the risks posed by pesticides to the estuary
and humans.
Back to Top
|